Former CN Hean Hunter Harrison courted to lead CP - 1/6/2012

 

By Scott Deveau, Financial PostJanuary 3, 2012

In his efforts to improve the operations of Canadian Pacific Railway Ltd., U.S. activist shareholder Bill Ackman has reached out to the railway's longtime nemesis, Hunter Harrison, in an attempt to see him replace the company's current chief executive, Fred Green.

Harrison, the former head of rival Canadian National Railway Co., has been retired since 2009.

His non-compete contract with CN and other railway companies expired on Saturday, making him the hottest commodity in the industry. Initial talks with Harrison have been held, and there is a "very high probability" he would accept the position as CP's chief executive if an agreement could be reached and the board approves the plan to replace Green, sources familiar with the talks said Friday.

There is currently no board meeting planned at CP. But if the transition at the top were to occur it would likely happen quickly, possibly within the next few weeks, the sources said.

The market reacted favourably to the news Friday with CP's shares gaining $2.49, or 3.7 per cent, to close at $69.01 on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

But while Harrison has garnered an admirable reputation in the rail industry through his self-styled mantra of "precision railroading," his integration into the management of CP may pose a challenge initially, said Karl Moore, a professor at the Desautels Faculty of Management at McGill University.

"There would have to be some hatchets buried just because of the rivalry between the two," he said. "He was the archrival as CEO at CN."

At CN, Harrison was notorious for holding so-called "Hunter Camps" at which he would drill the culture of operational excellence through precision railroading into his management team. Under Harrison it was more than simply a business model; it was a way of life. It is also something CN has carried on since his departure.

But ultimately, Harrison would be a dream candidate to succeed Green, Moore said.

"Clearly, he would be able to roll up his sleeves very rapidly and make some considerable changes at CP," he said.

Since his retirement, Harrison, 67, has shifted his attention to his horse stable business, and could not be reached for comment Friday. He became a legend in the rail business for his hard-nosed approach to improving the fluidity of the railways at which he worked. He joined CN in 1998 as its head of operations after his Illinois Central Railroad was gobbled up by Canada's largest railway. He took over as CEO of CN in 2003, transforming it from a bloated former Crown corporation to the leanest of North America's top tier railways.

CN's operating ratio - an important gauge of profitability measuring operating costs as a percentage of revenue - fell to an industryleading 67 per cent at the point of his retirement from the mid-80s when he joined (the lower the operating ratio the better). By contrast, CP, which has been suffering operational issues all year, had an operating ratio of 82.4 per cent year to date at the end of the third quarter.

But some of the gains Harrison made at CN for shareholders came at the expense of its customers.

CN's current chief executive, Claude Mongeau, himself an acolyte of Harrison's precision railroading, has tried to improve those frayed relations with the railway's customers and partners through a series of service agreements.



Read more: http://www.leaderpost.com/business/Former+head+Hunter+Harrison+courted+lead/5937635/story.html#ixzz1ii0fzaqY

>>>
FRA TOWN HALL MEETING - 1/4/2012

Plan to Attend

FRA logo

UTU-FRA Town Hall Meeting

All Railroad Crafts Invited to Attend

When: February 6th, 2012

Where: Holiday Inn Convention Center

Interstate 39 exit #158 Hwy 10 east. On the left next to the Holiday Inn Express

Stevens Point WI

Agenda Includes

Day long discussions on recent revisions to Federal Regulations

09:30 - 10:00 Registration

 

10:00 - 10:15 Introductions-Opening Remarks-UTU WLB

 

10:15 -11:45 Session 1 RSIA-Conductor Certifications - Certificate Components

Required Testing and Qualified Instructors, HOS Requirements, Territory Qualification-Required Pilots,

Medical Standards Guidelines, Prior Safe Driving Practices, Questions and Answers

FRA-Operating Practices

 

12:00 - 12:45 Luncheon – compliments of DLC

Presentations and Discussions on revised State and Federal Statutes

DLC

 

13:00 - 14:30 Session 2 RSIA-Conductor Certification - Certificate Components

Denial and Revocation of Certificate, Dispute Resolution Procedures, Appeals Procedures-Hearings,

Railroad Oversight responsibilities, Schedule of civil penalties, Questions and Answers

FRA-Operating Practices

 

14:45 - 15:30 Session 3

Update on Hazardous Materials Handing

FRA

 

15:30 - 16:45 Session 4

Update on Motive and Equipment Regulations

FRA

 

16:45 - 17:00 Closing Remarks, UTU-WLB

Sponsored by UTU-WLB and FRA - Region 4

>>>
Conductor certification: Clear track for Jan. 1 - 12/11/2011

Conductor certification: Clear track for Jan.1 

WASHINGTON – It’s now official. Conductor certification, mandated by the Rail Safety Improvement Act of 2008, has a clear track for Jan. 1 implementation.

In a final rule, published by the Federal Railroad Administration Nov. 9, railroads must implement, by Jan. 1, a formal training program for certifying conductors and a formal process for training prospective conductors, thus ensuring job competency.

The FRA’s final rule on conductor certification follows many of the provisions of locomotive engineer certification, with a number of improvements the UTU, joined by the BLET, was able to obtain.

Following are highlights of the final rule, which runs almost 300 pages in the Nov. 9 Federal Register.

* While the railroad and its employees must comply with the final rule, there is no limitation on any rights the employee may have under a collective bargaining agreement

* Conductors currently employed will be grandfathered for from one to three years, with one-third of those conductors required to be tested for certification in 2012, 2013 and 2014. Beginning in 2015, one-third of the total conductor workforce will be recertified each year.

* Each railroad, in submitting its proposed certification program to the FRA for approval, must simultaneously submit it to the presidents of the UTU and BLET, which will have 45 days to comment. The intent is to encourage coordination by carriers with local union officers in formulating the certification program, and to gain a supporting statement from the general committee of jurisdiction.

* A conductor losing certification may work as an assistant conductor, brakeman, yard helper, switchman or utility employee, but cannot work as a locomotive engineer. If that individual holds both conductor and engineer certification, and the engineer certification is revoked, they may not work as a conductor.

* If the conductor certificate is revoked because of failing to control a train, violation of train speed, violation of brake test requirement, occupying main track without proper authority, tampering with safety devices, or an alcohol or drug violation, the decertified conductor may not work as a locomotive engineer. However, if the decertification is for violation of a rule covering shoving or pushing movements, or equipment left out to foul track, switches and derails, the decertified conductor may work as a locomotive engineer.

* The conductor must be trained by a qualified person on the territory over which that conductor will operate. If the certified conductor lacks territorial qualification, and has never been qualified on main track physical characteristics, that conductor shall be assisted by a person who is a certified conductor qualified on the territory, and NOT a member of the crew.

* If the conductor has been previously qualified over the main track territory, and the time limits have expired on their qualification, the conductor may be assisted by any knowledgeable person, including a member of the crew, other than the locomotive engineer on the crew, so as not to conflict with other safety sensitive duties.

* If the conductor lacks territorial qualification on other than main track, the conductor, where practical, shall be assisted by a certified conductor meeting the territorial qualifications. Where this is not practical, the conductor shall be provided an appropriate job aid, which includes maps, charts or other visual aids of the territory. This applies to all tracks on each territory.

* Territorial qualification is not required for short movements of one mile or less where track speed is 20-mph or less and movement is required to be at restricted speed, and the track grade is less than 1 percent.

Prior to revoking conductor certification, a railroad must:

* Provide notice of the reason for suspension, and an opportunity for a hearing before a person other than the investigating officer. Written confirmation of the notification shall be in accordance with the collective bargaining agreement. Additionally, the hearing shall be in accordance with the collective bargaining agreement, but shall be convened within 10 days after the certificate is suspended, unless the conductor asks for a delay.

* Provide, no later than convening the hearing and notwithstanding any collective bargaining agreement, a copy of the written information and a list of the witnesses the railroad intends to present at the hearing. The railroad shall grant a recess if the information is provided just before the hearing. If the information is provided through written statements of an employee, the railroad shall make that employee available for examination during the hearing.

* Not revoke certification or recertification if there is sufficient evidence that an intervening cause prevented or materially impaired the conductor’s ability to comply with requirements.

Additionally, with regard to conductor certification:

* The appeal procedures largely mirror engineer certification regulations.

* The training requirements for new conductors are significantly improved from current requirements. In addition to improved initial training, this rule requires recurrent training for all conductors every three years during the recertification process. The recurrent training must be identified in the certification plan filed with FRA, including changes in operating rules, operating practices, new federal regulations and new equipment in service.

“The implementation of conductor certification enhances the skills and safety performance of freight and passenger conductors, provides a federal license ensuring proper training of conductors, and establishes a new basis for resisting management pressure to violate operating rules and federal regulations,” said UTU International President Mike Futhey.

The final rule is a result of input from all affected parties, including labor, through the FRA’s Rail Safety Advisory Committee (RSAC).

The UTU was represented on this RSAC Conductor Certification Working Group by Local 645 Chairperson Vinnie Tessitore, Local 1470 Chairperson David Brooks, General Chairperson (GO 049) John Lesniewski, Local 528 Legislative Representative Ron Parsons, Alternate National Legislative Director John Risch, National Legislative Director James Stem, and UTU Rail Safety Coordinator for Designated Legal Counsel Larry Mann.

>>>
Conductor wins $125,000 in whistle-blower complaint - 12/10/2011

A Wisconsin Central conductor has won a whistle-blower complaint against the carrier – collecting more than $125,000 in compensatory and punitive damages – for unlawful harassment and intimidation as the result of reporting an injury.

This was the third successful whistle-blower complaint filed against a railroad in recent months for violation of a worker’s rights under the Federal Rail Safety Act of 2007.

In the most recent case, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration ordered Wisconsin Central to cease and desist in its practice of automatically issuing notices of investigation for employees who report work injuries.

OSHA also ordered the carrier to pay the conductor lost wages, plus interest; $100,000 in punitive damages for its reckless disregard for the law; and $25,000 in compensatory damages for mental pain and emotional distress due to the humiliation and loss of income from the wrongful suspension. OSHA also ordered Wisconsin Central to provide all employees with a fact sheet advising them of their rights for reporting work-related injuries and illnesses.

According to the conductor’s attorney, the conductor reported an on-the-job injury, as required by railroad rules. The railroad subsequently issued a notice ordering the conductor to attend a formal investigation to ascertain his responsibility for sustaining a personal injury and to determine if the conductor violated any railroad rules.

Although it was determined that the railroad had abandoned previous efforts to treat an ice covered service road that the conductor was required to use in the performance of duties – resulting in the injury – Wisconsin Central found the conductor guilty of violating several rules and issued a 10-day suspension. The railroad alleged that by sustaining an injury, the conductor had violated the railroad’s rules.

Earlier this year, OSHA required Union Pacific to rehire a machinist it had fired following the reporting of a work-related injury, finding UP had improperly retaliated against him.

And in December 2010, OSHA ordered a conductor employed by BNSF to be reinstated after finding BNSF guilty of improper retaliation after the conductor filed an injury report.

The Federal Rail Safety Act of 2007 protects rail workers from retaliation and threats of retaliation when they report injuries, report that a carrier violated safety laws or regulations, or if the employee refuses to work under certain unsafe conditions or refuses to authorize the use of any safety related equipment.

Retaliation, including threats of retaliation, is defined as firing or laying off, blacklisting, demoting, denying overtime or promotion, disciplining, denying benefits, failing to rehire, intimidation, reassignment affecting promotion prospects, or reducing pay or hours.

An employer also is prohibited from disciplining an employee for requesting medical or first-aid treatment, or for following a physician’s orders, a physician’s treatment plan, or medical advice.

This protection is known as “whistle-blower protection,” and the federal law is enforced by OSHA, as it was against Wisconsin Central, UP and BNSF.

Relief may include reinstatement with the same seniority and benefits, back pay with interest, compensatory damages (including witness and legal fees), and punitive damages as high as $250,000.

A rail employee may file the complaint directly with OSHA, or may contact a UTU designated legal counsel, general chairperson or state legislative director for assistance.

A listing of UTU designated legal counsel is available at http://www.utu.org/, or may be obtained from local or general committee officers or state legislative directors.

To view a more detailed OSHA fact sheet, click on the following link:

http://www.osha.gov/Publications/OSHA-factsheet-whistleblower-railroad.pdf

>>>

Welcome to the Local 582 Website.

The new seniority Rosters Are not completed. Once they are they will be posted.

Next LMRC sceduled Jan 24-25

Amendment to Current Agreement: Merrillan/Arcadia have been moved from Home Terminal 2 "Wisconsin Rapids" to Home Terminal 3 "Taylor"

Our current officers are as follows:

 

LCA Officers :

Local Chairman: Jim Green

Vice Local Chairmen:

                                      Brian Buza

                                      Kyle Glodowski

                                      Todd Burg

Local Officers :

President: John Pennington

Vice President: Adam Fenlaciki

 

Secretary and Treasurer

 

Legislative Representative: Jeff Thompson